Relationship Compatibility Test Methodology

Abstract questions often invite an ideal answer. A scenario asks what you are most likely to do when a recognizable moment occurs: a disagreement stays unresolved, reassurance is needed, daily work feels uneven, closeness changes, or a future decision becomes real.

We Match uses 20 required scenarios, followed by a priority-ranking step and an optional open response. No single answer decides the outcome. Responses are combined within their relevant dimensions.

Each structured response contributes to one of the five dimensions. Some questions are directionally reversed to reduce repetitive response patterns. Dimension scores are normalized to a 0–100 scale, and the overall score summarizes the five dimensions.

Relationship context can influence the descriptive interpretation, but it does not turn the score into an objective probability of success. The ranking and optional written response add context for the paid report; they do not secretly override the free dimension scores.

We do not publish exact answer weights because doing so would make the assessment easier to game. The scoring system is a product framework, not a clinically validated psychometric instrument.

After payment confirmation, a third-party AI service receives the structured answers, calculated results, priority ranking, and any optional open response needed to draft the report. The report format asks the model to connect interpretations to specific assessment evidence instead of producing a generic relationship reading.

Grounding reduces unsupported generalization but does not eliminate AI error. A report may still be incomplete, inaccurate, or poorly suited to a particular situation. Read the Privacy Policy for data handling and the Terms of Service for limitations.